Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for the Study of Human Learning
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Centre for the Study of Human Learning}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for the Study of Human Learning}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Centre for the Study of Human Learning}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 12:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Centre for the Study of Human Learning]]=
:{{la|1=Centre for the Study of Human Learning}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Centre for the Study of Human Learning}})
Contains blanks sections, cites no sources. Horse.staple (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 29. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.