Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cezar Lungu (2nd nomination)
=[[Cezar Lungu]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cezar Lungu}}
:{{la|Cezar Lungu}} – (
:({{Find sources|Cezar Lungu}})
Article about a footballer who fails both WP:ATHLETE, having never played a fully pro match, and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 22:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - nothing has been done to address the concerns raised in the last deletion discussion. Jogurney (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
:I nominated this article for speedy deletion before taking it to AfD, but had it declined by someone claiming that Lungu passed WP:ATHLETE. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
::Oops, I didn't see that. An unfortunate decision, but in that case my vote is delete on the grounds that the article is about a non-notable footballer for all the same reasons listed in the past deletion discussion. Jogurney (talk) 01:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete no notability, no independent sources...--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:50, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Why deleted Cezar Lungu page? Cezar is professional football player. He played for Romania national under-21 football team, for FC Steaua Bucureşti in Romanian Cup and FC Steaua II Bucureşti in Liga II. Again, why deleted Cezar Lungu page 188.25.235.19 (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Comments First, please refrain from personal attacks. Second, the reasons to delete are quite clear in my view, generally because they do not meet the standards set forth in Wikipedia policies and guidelines--and specifically for the reasons outlined above in this discussion--specifically that the subject material does not meet our standards of notability. You can read about that at WP:N, but bear in mind that notability is merely one of the standards to meet. If you disagree, you can make comments here and point out to us why you believe the subject material does meet those standards and an impartial third party will evaluate the discussion to determine consensus.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.