Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Shank

:{{la|Chad Shank}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chad_Shank Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Chad Shank}})

WP:BLP of a podcaster with no strong or properly sourced claim to passing WP:CREATIVE -- the only sources here are his own appearances on other people's podcasts, and a press release announcing his hiring as circulation manager of a small town community newspaper (which is not something that gets a person into Wikipedia either.) A podcaster is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to verify that he exists -- he earns one by being the subject of substantive coverage in reliable sources, but nothing like that has been shown here. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom, notability has clearly not been established here. GAB^Hello! 16:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
• Delete He was a business-side manager of small papers in Arizona. I am not even sure if the circulation manager of the New York Times would be notable for such, but not of the Bisbee Review. He is also a podcaster, but there are thousands upon thousands of such, and nothing to demonstrate he is a notable one.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as still questionable for all applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.