Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champaben

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 00:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Champaben]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Champaben}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Champaben}})

I'm trying to clean up articles in projects Jainism and Hinduism. I came across this supposedly biographical article of a personality with poor notability. While I acknowledge that notable religious figures should have a separate article, I also see that this one simply only advertises the personality's religious beliefs and makes unsupported arguments without any credible secondary sources. The article may be deleted as there have been no sources as per WP:RS since January 2018. Tagging User:RJShashwat, User:Goyama and User:Expectopatronum30 for their views as they have been active in the project Jainism and have responded in an earlier AfD I nominated. Note that the creator of the article was blocked indefinitely in March 2018 for a lengthy history vandalising other articles and sockpuppetry. I also noticed that the creator of this article had created another one before this one with the name "Sister Champa" that I assume would refer to the same person. However that article was speedily deleted for not having enough reliable sources and poor notability of the subject of the article. ParvatPrakash (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, and Gujarat. ParvatPrakash (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete: No notability at all. Content about the subject can be added to Kanji swami as a section, but secondary reliable sources don't confirm whatever the article says. Goyama (talk) 07:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - Agree with the nominator. Besides, the only source mentioned in the article is inaccessible. RJShashwat (talk) 20:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.