Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanan Krivisky

=[[Chanan Krivisky]]=

:{{la|Chanan Krivisky}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Chanan Krivisky}})

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Baseball Watcher 17:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baseball Watcher 17:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Baseball Watcher 17:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Baseball Watcher 17:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

  • The notability of Chanan Krivisky has been established already, as can be seen in the edits. This article has already been removed from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanan Krivisky is calling said article into question due to one of the editors comments on another article which he re-edited. (Brewcrewer) harsh techniques should be noted as backlash, not objective editorial responsibility. User talk:Chonye is taking responsibility to clean up article. brew is submitting for deletion based on my edits on other articles. Please leave this one alone, it is a valid piece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuelgreen18 (talkcontribs) 19:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC) User:Samuelgreen18 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment Please keep this AfD on track with relevant comments only. Discuss the article and how it meets or does not meet Wikipedia policy, and not the editors. Avoid use of small text unless determined by the site software. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • I removed the small font size formatting to make Samuelgreen18's comments more legible. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails every Wikipedia notability criterion, especially WP:ACADEMIC. Article is a vanity page, promotional, point of view pushing, and original research. No reliable sources, or verifiable sources or extensive coverage found. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article makes no real assertion of notability—it lists the schools he's gone to and things he's done, but none of them are particularly noteworthy achievements. Additionally, I don't know what "circumnavigating" the peak of Mount Hood is supposed to mean. Does that mean he walked a circle around the sign marking the highest point? Either way, no one made a note of it. I'm struggling through the promotional material, but it's looks like he's a local rabbi and community center leader. Not someone who meets the WP:GNG, in any case. — Chromancer talk/cont 04:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete, blatant vanity page for a non-notable person. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 18:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. I may take a few minutes and edit down the fluff to see if there is anything I'm missing but it looks like a non-starter. Joe407 (talk) 03:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete Krivisky fails to qualify as notable according to Wikipedia's standards. Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 05:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete --- I don't think every rabbi needs a Wikipedia page, especially without strong sources which there are none. Is there really a reason Chanan should've be created on Wikipedia? SwisterTwister (talk) 06:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.