Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlemagne to Attila the Hun

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nick-D (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

=[[Charlemagne to Attila the Hun]]=

:{{la|Charlemagne to Attila the Hun}} ([{{fullurl:Charlemagne to Attila the Hun|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlemagne to Attila the Hun}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

non-notable genealogical aspiration, as yet unfulfilled. Basically a genealogical '6 degrees of Kevin Bacon' with no actual known solution Agricolae (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Agricolae (talk) 02:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unencylopedic, unsourced and unimportant. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 02:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete - no really substantive content. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete no evidence of notability; unencyclopedic. JJL (talk) 00:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Even if the line of descent could be traced, it is still not clear why it would be significant. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete for triviality. Drmies (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.