Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Scriven
=[[Charles Scriven]]=
:{{la|Charles Scriven}} – (
:({{Find sources|Charles Scriven}})
no indication of meeting guidelines at WP:PROF. References given are not significant coverage. noq (talk) 01:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
This article should be kept because Scriven is the President of a significant accredited college and also the Chair of a quite influential Adventist non-profit. Surely Presidents of colleges are significant enough to be written about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eraoihp (talk • contribs) 16:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- keep President of two fairly important Adventist colleges, meets WP:PROF. We normally interpret "major academic institution" to mean anything over the trivial level--if it meant research university, or even university, it would have said so. DGG ( talk ) 16:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 23:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:PROF, criteria section #5: the person "holds or has held a named chair appointment"..."at a major institution of higher education and research." Northamerica1000(talk) 10:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep President of two fairly important Adventist colleges, and therefore meets WP:PROF. --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:Reliable Sources and WP:PROF. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep As DGG said, WP:PROF has been met. Dream Focus 10:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Weak keep Poorly written article. Scriven is a trained theologian with a traditional Seventh Day Adventist stance on evolution.[http://spectrummagazine.org/blog/2010/06/24/yes-creation-faithfulness-or-folly] Mathsci (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.