Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CheckMarket

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[CheckMarket]]=

:{{la|CheckMarket}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CheckMarket Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|CheckMarket}})

Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete as my searches found nothing good at all apart from non-significant results. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete searches showed nothing to meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete All sources used are either wp:primary sources, directory listings or blogs. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.