Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Lehman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Zappa 24 Mati 23:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Cheryl Lehman]]=

:{{la|Cheryl Lehman}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cheryl_Lehman Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cheryl Lehman}})

This article has been a work in progress for a few months now, and I don't feel it yet meets Wikipedia standards for notability of an academic WP:ACADEMIC. I've discussed the matter in the past with the editor/creator of the page, and have given him more than a month to address the concerns. There should be some record of this on the article's talk page. —Boruch Baum (talk) 03:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Five publications with over 100 citations each in Google scholar should be enough for WP:PROF#C1. The article does not look in particularly bad shape for an academic stub, so I don't agree with the nominator that it has severe enough problems to need deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep This a stub, but properly sourced and the subject seems notable. The poor state of an article is not in itself grounds for deletion. Dimadick (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Snow Keep. Concur. Accounting is not a high-citation field, so 5 papers having >100 GS cites is notable. Please close. Agricola44 (talk) 15:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC).

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm the nominator and would like to withdraw my nomination, based upon the accumulated consensus. I guess that would be done using "speedy keep #1"; however, I'm having trouble finding out how to perform one. The pages WP:SPEEDY and WP:CLOSEAFD haven't helpful to me in figuring out the way to do this. —Boruch Baum (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.