Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chewker

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Chewker]]=

:{{la|Chewker}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chewker Stats])

:({{Find sources|Chewker}})

Non-notable fusion board game; the only hits for "Chewker" on [http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Chewker%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=%22Chewker%22&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&tbm=bks&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=otpYUMeCEMHu0gH4_YDgAw&ved=0CA0Q_AUoAA&prmdo=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=d189b5343ff9fbc1&biw=1919&bih=869 Google Books] and [http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Chewker%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=%22Chewker%22&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&prmdo=1&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=-9pYUN6wB4jv0gH3-4AI&ved=0CB8QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=52fbb4c739f4f55&biw=1919&bih=869 Google News archives] look like false positives. CtP (t • c) 20:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete Even after cleaning up the obvious spam, this article shows no evidence of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Speedy delete No assertion of notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

:*Well, that would be A7, but it doesn't technically cover games… ignore all rules, then? CtP (t • c) 20:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

:::I don't understand why A7 is limited to certain entities, but it is at the moment. Might as well let this AfD carry through. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete as a reasonably good example of why WP:NFT actually could benefit from having a speedy deletion criterion assigned to it. Jclemens (talk) 23:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Speedy delete A brand new game can't have achieved notability yet. Clearly an advertisement to promote sales of the game. I myself have created hybrid chess-checkers and chess-shogi games; the concept isn't original enough to establish notability before the game forms a community of players or becomes a market success. DOSGuy (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.