Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei}})

No in-depth discussion of the Television serial that would help with notability. Fails WP:GNG Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep Google news links above show presumably RS coverage. WP:TROUT to nominator for AfD'ing an article on a current topic less than 24 hours after its creation: Very WP:BITEy. Jclemens (talk) 20:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment: Several editing accounts have sought to create an article on this new TV show: see :Draft:Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei (rejected at AfC) and :Draft:Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei 2. The present instance appears to have originated as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chikoo_Ki_Mummy_Durr_Kei&oldid=1046335793 a copy of the rejected draft], with subsequent development by another editor, so a history merge may be appropriate? AllyD (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment While this is from a new editor, it has a long history. The existing rejected drafts exists and a new page coming up in mainspace most of the time stinks of SP. But yes, bity from definition. Sorry for that. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Fixed the issue of WP:GNG with references to satisfy notability117.193.129.18 (talk) 12:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

: Eh? Please provide sources that you have added in this discussion for WP:GNG. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep. Seems to pass GNG based on the sources in the article and those that appear in the google news link above. Clearly WP:BEFORE was not followed.4meter4 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

: All sources given are announcements. There is no critical reception of the show. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 23:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep. As per listed above. I think the discussion should be closed now. Shinnosuke15 (talk) 09:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.