Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chin Chih Yang

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

=[[Chin Chih Yang]]=

:{{la|Chin Chih Yang}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chin_Chih_Yang Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Chin Chih Yang}})

I prodded it with the following rationale by which I still stand: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement." Passing mention in NYT and BBC doesn't change anything, notability requires non-trivial (i.e. dedicated, not passing) mentions. Deprodded by User:Espresso Addict] (courtesy ping) with the following counter-argument: "efs/ext links contain sufficient evidence of notability to merit wider discussion at Af". Ok, here we are - now, can anyone present better sources? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete I found this source, [http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/violent-end-to-public-art-project-in-queens/] but nothing else. More reliable sources are definitely needed. LaMona (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.