Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Attacks

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing to merge, book already mentioned in author's article JohnCD (talk) 12:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

=[[China Attacks]]=

:{{la|China Attacks}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|China Attacks}})

Spamvertisement by a COI editor for his own self-published book; no assertion of notability, no sources, no evidence of notability - a blatant self-advertisement and failure to meet :WP:BOOK Orange Mike | Talk 00:29, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. No indication of “notability”. —SlamDiego←T 14:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge to Chuck DeVore until further notability is established. Depending on how far Assemblyman DeVore gets in running for the chance to oppose Barbara Boxer as U.S. Senator from California, this might very easily become notable. I don't see any sign that this made much of an impact in China, Taiwan, or the United States even though it made some (some) news back in 2000 [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=devore+china+attacks&scoring=n&hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2000&as_hdate=2009&lnav=hist11]. Mandsford (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Already discussed in “Chuck DeVore#Book”. (Not sure that it merits much discussion there, but that's another matter.) —SlamDiego←T 18:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete No standalone notability. The fact that DeVore published a book is all that's necessary to be mentioned, and that's already done. GlassCobra 23:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.