Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choices of the Heart

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, nominator with drew nomination, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMichaelQSchmidt&diff=232345717&oldid=232253224 (Non-admin closure). Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Choices of the Heart]]=

:{{la|Choices of the Heart}} ([{{fullurl:Choices of the Heart|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choices of the Heart}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

It's only claim to notability is it's connection to the people killed in El Salvador. (The four nuns who died, and received quite a bit of publicity.) It fails WP:MOVIE and google returns [http://www.google.com/search?q=Choices+of+the+Heart&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a nothing but IMDb]. Leonard^(Bloom) 17:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC

~~Delete~~Keep ~~The movie fails WP:MOVIE. No refs,sources,etc that would suggest notability.~~Based on sources found by Schmidt.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Very strong KEEP. I just did a search and found several excellent secondary sources and some nice tertiary ones that should allow me to tweak the article into respectable shape. TI placed them on the article's page as external links. What really impressed me was this full page [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9903E3D71E39F936A35751C1A965948260&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/F/Ford,%20Ita article] in the New York Times of December 51983. It is most definitely notable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Performed a cleanup per WP:Film/Style guidelines. Needs to be catagorized. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Categorized it, I think. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep per sources found by Schmidt. Nom's google search brings up over 700,000 hits, hardly "nothing but IMDb". PC78 (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - a notable movie --T-rex 16:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Important Comment: Nom graciously wishes to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMichaelQSchmidt&diff=232345717&oldid=232253224 withdraw] the nomination. How is this done? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

:I'll close it now if no one has any objections.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.