Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chongalicious

{{#ifeq:Chongalicious|Chongalicious||

:{{la|Chongalicious}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Many other videos on YouTube have been seen by thousands of people. It is unclear why this video in particular should have its own page here. LoserTalent 21:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete completely non-notable. AKRadecki 21:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• keep - unfortunately, when you actually go and read the article and follow the links, you'll find this video was written about in the Miami Herald and featured in an article at the NBC TV site. I personally agree this topic is completely non-notable, but it seems to pass the Wikipedia notability standard (being written about in major press). Goes to show you, huh? However, feel free to begin a world-shaking debate on how Wikipedia's notability standards must be worthless if an article like this could be allowed to stay. I'm with you on that. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 21:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep -- passes WP:NOTE because of the media attention (which is linked in the article. -- MisterHand 21:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep -- definitely passes WP:V due to the media attention given by several reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. It does pass WP:NOTE and may possibly be quite popular. The Hooded One 01:01, 22 May 2007
• Keep. Passes. The entry list sources that verify the information 09:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.