Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chopaal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 05:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Chopaal]]=

:{{la|Chopaal}} ([{{fullurl:Chopaal|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chopaal}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

non notable website Weisr123 (talk) 15:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. There are a few blog references, but no reliable sources. Axl (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - this site is commercial, thus it is notable. Also the article is undergoing a major revamping, so we'd better wait 3 months. If later the article is still a stub and contains no appropriate 3rd sources, then we can delete it. --RekishiEJ (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC) fixed 16:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC) fixed again 16:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  • : "this site is commercial, thus it is notable." That's not correct. See Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Axl (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  • : "the article is undergoing a major revamping, so we'd better wait 3 months." The article was created on 25th July by Asimfayaz. He included the tag "underconstruction". Since then, one user adjusted the stub tag, and another user added the AFD tag. There is no sign of "a major revamping". See Wikipedia:Deletion of pages under construction. Of note, "Generally, when an article is labeled "under construction," it shall be considered to be under construction as long as not more than one week (seven days) passes without a significant addition being made to the page." Axl (talk) 17:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: No reliable sources to show notability per WP:N, WP:WEB or WP:ORG. --JD554 (talk) 09:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —JD554 (talk) 09:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —JD554 (talk) 09:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.