Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Blazek

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

=[[Chris Blazek]]=

:{{la|Chris Blazek}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Chris Blazek}})

Non-notable minor league baseball player who has not played since 2010. Though his article was de-prodded because he might sign with someone else, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. It is unlikely that he will reach the major leagues, per reasonable judgement, due to multiple factors including his age, his previous highest level of play (Double-A) and his recent injury history. Seems to fail WP:BASE/N and WP:GNG, and most coverage seems WP:ROUTINE. Alex (talk) 21:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Scott, how can you claim CRYSTAL while violating CRYSTAL in the very next breath? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

:*Interesting point. Rlendog (talk) 22:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 16:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Delete Blazek fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT.--Giants27(T|C) 19:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete I can't find anything that satisfies WP:BASE/N or WP:GNG, despite the WP:CRYSTAL ball prediction displayed in the nom of whether or not this player will reach the majors. Agent Vodello^{OK, Let's Party, Darling!} 21:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete Same reasons as others.--Yankees10 02:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete per above. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete not finding evidence of notability. Rlendog (talk) 22:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.