Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Cowan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

=[[Chris Cowan]]=

:{{la|Chris Cowan}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Cowan}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Chris Cowan}})

I just cannot find any notable references to him at all, aside from his book on something he hypothesises called "Spiral Dynamics", and on which he wrote a book. Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 09:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

:Of course not, that's his life's work. — goethean ॐ 02:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

::I appreciate that it's his life's work, but does it make him notable? - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 11:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. GS search produces cites of 276 (for a co-authored book) and 2 for a single authored. Fails WP:Prof #1. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC).
Delete and redirect to Spiral Dynamics. The system is notable, Cowan is not. MiRroar (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.