Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Huebner
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Chris Huebner]]=
:{{la|1=Chris Huebner}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Chris Huebner}})
Running a check on articles with old notability issues. This one seems to fail WP:NPROF. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators. UtherSRG (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Only has 11 citations in GScholar, even for his field of study, I wonder if that helps notability. Rest seems non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I found a couple of reviews of his book A Precarious Peace: Yoderian Explorations on Theology, Knowledge, and Identity.[https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA218190789&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00259373&p=LitRC&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E3cfde7c5&aty=open+web+entry][https://directionjournal.org/38/1/precarious-peace-yoderian-explorations.html]. He's a theologian, so probably we're dealing with a lot of offline sources and I wouldn't put much faith in GScholar at all. – Joe (talk) 14:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Canada. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
:Weak keep - per Joe Roe, he appears to just barely meet WP:AUTHOR. - car chasm (talk) 19:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
::Weak keep based on the reviews as above, seems fine. AUTHOR or Academic notability as has had some critical notice in the field they work in. Oaktree b (talk) 04:11, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.