Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christel Quek

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 07:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Christel Quek]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Christel Quek}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Christel Quek}})

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable "technology entrepreneur". Falls short of WP:SIGCOV. For more background: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheWikiholic. US-Verified (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

::Delete BBC is an interview, rest are typical PR items. The "30 under 30 lists" and the like are non-notable. Removing the PR crypto items, we don't have much left for sourcing. Delete for not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

::Weak keep per WP:BASIC - sustained coverage of her work. There is often not much depth, but there are more than trivial mentions over time that seem to support her notability. 41.46.55.166 (talk) 04:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)41.46.55.166 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete. Most of the sources seem like webcruft and we don't typically take "X under X" awards as much more than grains of salt. 128.252.154.2 (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete possible self promotion with a single purpose editor working on it. The references are mainly passing mentions or PR. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep- Some of the cited sources mentions her as a tech entrepreneur, for example, [https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/feb/11/ten-digital-strategists-watch-2013 The Guardian], [https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/12/26/bolt-were-rewarding-users-for-watching-advertisements.html CNBC], [https://www.bbc.com/news/av/business-58185582 BBC]. and bolt is a publicly traded company as discussed on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bolt_(social_network) Bolt AfD] so there might be more coverage around her, however, the article needs a revamp. 187.121.226.116 (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)187.121.226.116 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

:: Interesting that you found this AfD with your first edit on Wikipedia. LibStar (talk) 07:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

::The CNBC and BBC is merely her describing the company and not WP:SIGCOV about her. LibStar (talk) 07:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

  • Delete - Related to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bolt_(social_network) Bolt] which was deleted. Aside from the paid, sock, and AfC manipulation, the subject does not meet notability guidelines. She is mentioned in a lot of places for founding the company but there isn't anything in-depth. Even IP says "sources mentions her as a tech entrepreneur." That is correct, they mention her. We need to see references that "focus" on her.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

:Delete based on the SPI and non-notable sources Karnataka (talk) 21:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.