Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Dvorak
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. North America1000 10:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
=[[Christian Dvorak]]=
:{{la|Christian Dvorak}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Christian Dvorak}})
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 08:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: He led his league in goals this year and was second in points; it's arguable that he'll be named to the First All-Star Team, and all that'd be a pass on criterion #4. Ravenswing 05:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep since while he doesn't quite meet NHOCKEY yet, I think he does meet GNG. The article already has some sources (though they're well hidden); additional reliable sources with significant independent coverage can be found [http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/juniors/london-knights-marner-dvorak-tkachuk-good-last/ here] and [http://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nhl/coyotes/2015/07/09/arizona-coyotes-christian-dvorak-prospects-nhl/29943217/ here] at least, and he's received plenty of local coverage in The London Free Press. Sideways713 (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reasons as Ravenswing and Sideways. -DJSasso (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Ravenswing and Sideways713. Ejgreen77 (talk) 00:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.