Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christie Vilsack

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Christie Vilsack]]=

:{{la|Christie Vilsack}} ([{{fullurl:Christie Vilsack|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christie Vilsack}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable spouse of former Iowa governor, no independent references currently used. Marcusmax(speak) 00:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep The article appears to assert notability, and we have other articles on "First Ladies of Iowa". a little insignificant 01:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • :Delete Fails WP:N, and half the article is about here husband and family. The only claim to notability directly relating to her is the invite to speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. a little insignificant 01:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Redirector Merge to hubby's article. Notability is not inherited. Spouses, siblings, parents, and children of political leaders get lots of derivative press mentions. In my view, that does not amount to notability. If they use the opportunity thus afforded them to do things on their own which make them notable, then they should have their own articles. If they are mentioned in the press merely for being the politician's family member (rather than as, say, an author, a foreign agent, an entrepreneur, an artist, an entertainer or a criminal), then they should similarly be covered only in the politician's article. Edison (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails notability. Only reason anyone has heard of her is because of her marriage, not because of her achievements. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Notability is not inherited, no non-trivial sources for her without her husband in the picture. Also there appears to be a lot of these first ladies/gents - List of current United States first spouses with pages of their own. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.