Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Reed

:{{la|Christina Reed}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christina_Reed Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Christina Reed}})

WP:BLP of a writer, referenced entirely to pieces of her own writing (as well as the post-nomination addition of a WP:ELNO-violating linkfarm of primary sources and Q&A interviews in which she's the speaker and not the subject). This is not how you source a writer as notable enough for a Wikipedia article: she has to be the subject of reliable source coverage written by other people, not the bylined author of reliable source coverage of other things, to clear Wikipedia's notability tests. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Interviews do not count towards notability. So we have 0 sources that count as reliable, 3rd-party secondary sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. Refs don't support notability, they aren't about her or are written by her. Szzuk (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.