Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Emmett

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECT to Corby by-election, 2012 seems the best result based on the consensus judgment that this candidate only deserves a page if she wins, which both preserves her name as a search term for that article and will allow for easy recreation if called for. postdlf (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Christine Emmett]]=

:{{la|Christine Emmett}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christine_Emmett Stats])

:({{Find sources|Christine Emmett}})

Prod was contested, so moving to AfD. Emmett is a candidate in a forthcoming election with no other notability. She clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. Bondegezou (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment. It says she's an incumbent, and she's running to fill a post open due to a resignation. Was she appointed to temporarily fill the vacancy? And, if so, does that make her a sitting MP? AND, if that's the case, does that meet WP:POLITICIAN? I agree, if she were just a candidate, that she would not (as yet) be notable. But a sitting MP, even if temporarily, is a different bowl of fruit. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:41, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • That's an error in the infobox, which I've now fixed. She's merely a candidate. Commons seats are never temporarily filled. Bondegezou (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • My political knowledge is mostly US-centric; some congressional seats are filled temporarily, others not. I didn't have a chance to delve into it further, so thanks for clarifying. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • No problem. Bondegezou (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete, as per above, given that she's only a candidate for office. If elected, you might have a better case for notability - but first things first. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep. The Corby by-election is due within a month and as the candidate for the ruling party, she is temporarily notable. If she features prominently in the Press prior to the by-election or if she is elected to office, then the page should be expanded. If not, the article should then be put up for deletion. Maxkingesq (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I recognise that the Corby by-election is soon. However, notability should be something determined in the present and something that is permanent. If she becomes notable in the future, the article could be re-created. For now, I reject the concept that someone can be "temporarily notable": that's why we have guidance like WP:ONEVENT and WP:NOT#NEWS. Bondegezou (talk) 07:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
  • REdirect to by-election page. We will need an article if she wins, and can delete afte rthe election if hse loses. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:07, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  • delete Does not meet WP:GNG due to WP:ONEVENT guidelines. If she wins, and receives notable coverage then the page can be recreated. Until then, I agree with Bondegezou.Righteousskills (talk) 19:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  • delete, largely per Bondegezou (COI disclaimer; I campaigned for a different party in the same approximate region, although not the same seat. I'd obliterate articles for my (ex)-party's candidates just the same). Ironholds (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.