Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Gavin
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
=[[Christine Gavin]]=
:{{la|Christine Gavin}} – (
:({{Find sources|Christine Gavin}})
No evidence of notability, fails the general notability guideline; winner of a £150 prize and co-author of one paper (submitted but not accepted). GILO A&E⇑ 08:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. unsourced non-notable self-promotion per WP:PROMOTION that is sole contribution by creator. Canuckle (talk) 14:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No indication that she has recived the widespread coverage for her research we would expect for it to be deemed notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see how the subject is notable. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete - I have attempted to clean up this stub, but I am unsure how to prove notability, per WP:BEFORE, WP:MOS, etc. There are assertions that the subject is notable, but there are no secondary sources. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This person appears to be a [https://www.surrey.ac.uk/maths/people/chrissy_gavin/index.htm graduate student] and I can find no contributions in WoS. Uncontroversial delete. Agricola44 (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC).
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.