Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 00:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize]]=

:{{la|Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christopher_Ewart-Biggs_Memorial_Prize Stats])

:({{Find sources|Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize}})

fails WP:GNG. in 35 years of existence a mere 7 gnews hits. [http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&cf=all&ned=au&hl=en&tbm=nws&gl=au&as_epq=Christopher%20Ewart-Biggs%20Memorial%20Prize&as_occt=any&as_drrb=a&tbs=ar%3A1&authuser=0] LibStar (talk) 07:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep The prize has many notable recipients and reliable sources are available, see [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22Christopher+Ewart-Biggs+Memorial+Prize%22&oq=%22Christopher+Ewart-Biggs+Memorial+Prize%22&gs_l=news-cc.12..43j43i400.2211.2211.0.3375.1.1.0.0.0.0.59.59.1.1.0...0.0...1ac.2.lzHWgnkJG6w#hl=en&gl=us&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Ewart-Biggs+Memorial+Prize%22&oq=%22Ewart-Biggs+Memorial+Prize%22&gs_l=serp.3...10255.10255.0.10442.1.1.0.0.0.0.67.67.1.1.0.cesh..0.0...1.1.CgPJsq6SEQs&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=b0e751c06b6365ae&biw=1280&bih=818] or [http://www.google.cz/search?q=%22Ewart-Biggs+Memorial+Prize%22&btnG=Hledat+knihy&tbm=bks&tbo=1&hl=cs]. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep See Wikipedia:GOOGLEHITS#Google_test. Not a valid criteria for deletion. The article is about a literary prize. The article lacks references of which there are a substantial number but that is easily rectified.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1323926/Ewart-Biggs-prize-is-won-by-Lost-Lives.html For example] Kernel Saunters (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. The sources brought up by the previous editors are sufficient to meet notability in my opinion. Deletion is only wise for things it is impossible to reliably source, not articles which merely have not incorporated available sources.--Talain (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sufficient sources available. Also note that a less restricted GNews search for <"Ewart-Biggs" prize> yields about 50 hits.[http://www.google.com/search?q=Ewart-Biggs+Prize&hl=en&safe=off&gl=au&authuser=0&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=Bf9YUPS_N67iigL87oGAAQ&start=0&sa=N&biw=1280&bih=671]--Arxiloxos (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.