Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Long (director)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. KTC (talk) 07:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Christopher Long (director)]]=

:{{la|Christopher Long (director)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christopher_Long_(director) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Christopher Long (director)}})

Subject does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE Makro (talk) 18:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (negotiate) @ 20:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

:*Delete. I'm having a tough time finding information of him on Google.--A Wild Abigail Appears! Capture me. Moves. 21:29, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: Be warned that this editor has been making several bad faith AfDs in response to his own article's AfD. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 17:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arfæst! 18:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep. Satisfies WP:CREATIVE criteria #3. There are [http://www.metacritic.com/movie/naked-fame eight reviews] for Naked Fame on Metacritic and [http://articles.latimes.com/2007/mar/23/entertainment/et-idol23 this review] of Idol by the Los Angeles Times. {{reply to|AbigailAbernathy}} For filmmakers, try Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic. They link to reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. No, it doesn't satisfy WP:creative #3 ("The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work..."). The LAT blurb for 'Idol' notes it airing at only one theater, and Naked Time (his most-successful project) only grossed a quarter-million, so neither is significant or well-known. Pax 04:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment - Pretty thin cites available, but I am concerned any time WP:POINTy pollutes the AfD process. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - was able to add some refs, but for the most part I am only finding reviews where a nice solid interview or profile would be better for establishing notability. Probably scrapes by on WP:CREATIVE. Artw (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - plenty of film reviews to pass GNG. Naked Fame is perfectly notable as a "significant or well-known work"; gross profit is irrelevant, press coverage is what matters. Earflaps (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.