Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Pimental

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Christopher Pimental]]=

:{{la|Christopher Pimental}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Pimental}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Christopher Pimental}})

This BLP is unsourced. I couldn't find books by this writer on amazon.com or mentions of his name in the google news archives, suggesting that he may be non-notable. Also, some of the statements in the article seem to be possible BLP violations (like the part about his "murky" past). Maybe someone can find sources for this article? Otherwise I think it should probably be deleted. CordeliaNaismith (talk) 05:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete No reliable sources outside of [http://www.webdigestweekly.com/Salon.html blogs] or self published references. No reviews of his works published by independent and trustworthy journals and websites. Christopher Pimental fails WP:AUTHOR, in my opinion. --Vejvančický (talk) 22:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete - seems to have some stories published in a specialty magazine. There is no coverage about him in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 19:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.