Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromaview

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all.. - Philippe 03:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[Chromaview]]=

:{{la|Chromaview}} ([{{fullurl:Chromaview|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromaview}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I have [http://news.google.ca/archivesearch?q=Chromaview&hl=en&um=1&sa=N&start=10 looked in] Google News archives and also searched a database of newspaper and magazine articles, but could find no evidence that Chromaview or its two yet-to-be-launched publications have been the subject of third-party coverage to satisfy WP:N (or WP:ORG) guidelines. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages, the two yet-to-be-launched magazines:

:{{la|American Contemporary Art}}

:{{la|Art Graduate Portfolio}} Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, per nom. Nakon 22:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete, unless independent verifiable sources can be found.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Useless without sources. ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 22:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.