Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Hadley
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
=[[Chuck Hadley]]=
:{{la|Chuck Hadley}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Chuck Hadley}})
Non-notable businessman (little/no coverage in RS that I can find), unsuccessful candidate for political office. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Also the fact that there are zero references. Delete it, delete it. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 22:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- As always, per WP:NPOL an unelected candidate for office does not earn an article on Wikipedia just for the fact of being a candidate — if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced case that they were already notable enough for an article for other reasons independent of the candidacy, then they must win the election, not just run in it, to become notable enough. But that hasn't been demonstrated here; the article just asserts that he exists, and fails to cite a single source at all. Also worth noting that the article was nominated for prod last year, but the prod template was removed by an anonymous IP WP:SPA with no explanation or improvement. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Searches at News, Books, browser (this one found some results for the nomination), highbeam and thefreelibrary (this [http://www.thefreelibrary.com/_/search/Search.aspx?SearchBy=0&q=chuck+hadley&Search=Search&By=0 one] found a Chuck Hadley for a Fluidnet though). Nothing to suggest he is notable as a politician or businessman. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Being one of 165 or more candidates for the Pennsylvania Assembly from major parties who lost in the year he ran does not make Hadley notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.