Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChyronHego Corporation

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chyron Corporation. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

=[[ChyronHego Corporation]]=

:{{la|ChyronHego Corporation}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ChyronHego_Corporation Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|ChyronHego Corporation}})

Still not convincing substance to actually suggest independent notability, I still confirm my PROD. SwisterTwister talk 03:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:18, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:18, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:29, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:29, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Comment – The company was previously named Chyron Corporation, for which an article exists. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

:({{Find sources AFD|Chyron Corporation}})

Comment: The merge previously proposed by {{ping|Trivialist}} should probably be considered in parallel with this AfD. One factor relevant to the AfD is the "genericized trademark": a [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Chyron+characters&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=xHqtV420JcjU8gehuaDoBg#q=Chyron+characters&tbm=bks Google Books search] does confirm use of "chyron" as a term of art, which should be referenced into the article(s) if someone has access to a source in better than snippet view. AllyD (talk) 07:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 21:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Redirect to Chyron Corporation as both articles discuss the same company, only Chyron Corporation does the job better. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.