Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality]]=

:{{la|Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Citizens_for_Undead_Rights_and_Equality Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality}})

Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of Political Parties and this party does not proof importance or notability, prior to, during, or after the one election it contested. No lasting impact on politics significant enough to justify an article. doktorb _words^deeds 04:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 04:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 04:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete. All the coverage I can find in news, scholarly and book sources is trivial. No significant coverage means failure to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Ralbegen (talk) 08:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment. The unsourced quote from the leader must be inaccurate in that it refers to the coalition, but the party was formed and stood before that was formed. RobinCarmody (talk) 23:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.