Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citroën C-Cactus

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Citroën C-Cactus]]=

:{{la|Citroën C-Cactus}} ([{{fullurl:Citroën C-Cactus|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citroën C-Cactus}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Listing on behalf of {{User|Ftr2k7}} with reason: "This is horribly written in the style of an advert, farly obviously by Citroen PR people. No-one is stepping forward to change it, and I can't do much constructive editing to it as I know very little about the car. I say it should be taken down until more reliable info is available about the car", originally posted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FMale_pregnancy&diff=230814067&oldid=230812294 here]. No opinion on deletion of article myself. roleplayer 15:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep The person who wrote this article also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toyota_iQ&diff=prev&oldid=159127596 added information] in the same style to an article about a Toyota car, so I doubt Citroën PR people wrote this article. There are [http://news.google.ie/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Citro%C3%ABn+C-Cactus%22 reliable sources] about the car, and it meets WP:V and WP:N. That being said, the article currently has a promotional, biased tone. I'll take some of the promotional stuff out of the article, but I don't know much either and the article could do with editing by a knowledgeable person. Bláthnaid talk 15:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, needs to be cleaned up, not deleted. References look sound, just nees a tidy up. Per AfD policy "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD", "tag the article with any noted problems such so everyone viewing the article are aware and therefore may fix it".  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 01:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong keep - Cleanup is not a rationale for deletion.  Asenine  15:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.