Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City News Los Angeles

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:City News Los Angeles}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City News Los Angeles}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:City News Los Angeles}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

=[[:City News Los Angeles]]=

:{{la|1=City News Los Angeles}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=City News Los Angeles}})

I cannot find any mention of this newspaper in any source. While obviously it did exist at one time (their website is [https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/http://www.citynewsla.com/ archived] on the Wayback Machine), the lack of any third-party coverage means that it clearly fails GNG. Pinguinn 🐧 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Sexuality and gender, and California. Pinguinn 🐧 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Delete: No coverage for this news outlet. The LOC has a similar newspaper that stopped publication in 1987, that's about all that comes up in my searches. Sourcing now in the article is paltry, with only their own website. Nothing notable that I can see. Oaktree b (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.