Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Leng

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

=[[Claire Leng]]=

:{{la|Claire Leng}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Leng}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Claire Leng}})

Fails WP:ENT and WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Long-unsourced article without any significant claims of notability; PROD removed without any assertion of notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete No indication of notability. Dismas|(talk) 15:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Dismas|(talk) 15:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - Per nom. Fails to meet any form of notability criteria. EuroPride (talk) 12:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep She is a notable galmour model in the UK where she was a 1998 covergirl and centerfold model for Rustler Magazine issue no. 275[http://uk.ebid.net/for-sale/rustler-275-1998-claire-leng-clare-margeson-18522155.htm] She has numerous appearances in several Playboy publications. Iftelse (talk) 16:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep Based on how many times Playboy has chosen to publish her. Dream Focus 06:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO and GNG. Epbr123 (talk) 15:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.