Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Class of 77

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 02:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

=[[Class of 77]]=

:{{la|Class of 77}} – (View AfD)(View log)

NN musical. No assertion of notability. —  MusicMaker 21:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. YechielMan 23:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Nom. Also no secondary sources, therefore not notable under WP:N. Only one newspaper reference which appears to be just a listing, so unlikely to prove notability. Assize 10:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Nom. Also, largely unintelligible. - Special-T 15:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, don't know about "unintelligible", but real notability and sourcing problems. Lankiveil 03:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete - Will be extremely difficult to source. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 22:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.