Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Imhoff (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Claudia Imhoff]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Imhoff}}

:{{la|Claudia Imhoff}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Claudia_Imhoff_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Claudia Imhoff}})

A look for additional sources on the subject revealed a low number of independent, in-depth coverage. Most results were from press releases or venues connected to subject. Her books do not appear to have garnered much attention either. Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. Delta13C (talk) 07:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

:Comment:I want to be clear that I reviewed the previous AfD, but disagree that "Google Book" listings can be used to establish notability. What we need are RSes about her to convey notability. -Delta13C (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwiftyPeep (talk) 09:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.