Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Mitchell
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
=[[:Claudia Mitchell]]=
:{{la|Claudia Mitchell}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Claudia Mitchell}})
Not a notable person. WP:ONEEVENT and the article only has one source. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 01:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: per WP:SUSTAINED. The subject had received initial coverage from sources like the [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5348458.stm BBC], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091302271.html?nav=E8 Washington Post], [https://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=2432068&page=1 ABC News], and [https://www.theage.com.au/world/bionic-arms-turn-science-fiction-to-fact-20060916-ge35b4.html The Age]. And the progression of her arm has received sustained coverage by numerous high-quality sources over the years: [https://www.theguardian.com/science/2007/nov/27/medicalresearch The Guardian], [https://www.technologyreview.com/2009/04/21/213685/a-lifelike-prosthetic-arm/ MIT Technology Review], [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/07/30/muscle-memory The New Yorker], [https://www.chicagomag.com/chicago-magazine/january-2007/breakthrough-medicine/ Chicago Magazine], [https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11094-woman-with-bionic-arm-regains-sense-of-touch/ New Scientist], [https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MedicalMysteries/story?id=5715902&page=1 ABC News], [https://gizmodo.com/portraits-in-posthumanity-claudia-mitchell-5532085 Gizmodo], [https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/060418/first-woman-to-get-bionic-arm-can-now-feel-with-prosthetic-fingers.html Deaccan Chronicle], [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/2778460/Breakthrough-lets-rewired-woman-feel-sensation-in-bionic-hand.html The Telegraph], [https://www.brookings.edu/research/our-cyborg-future-law-and-policy-implications/#footnote-89 Brookings] Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep there seem to be plenty of references available, I've added one more to the article. She seems to be notable as a person not just "first woman". --Scott Davis Talk 04:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Plenty of coverage when this happened, and there is continuing coverage of updates more than a decade later such as [https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/060418/first-woman-to-get-bionic-arm-can-now-feel-with-prosthetic-fingers.html this piece].--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 08:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Follows all the norms, has reliable sources also. Article is notable enough to be kept.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.