Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearpoint Mechanical Pencil

=[[Clearpoint Mechanical Pencil]]=

:{{la|Clearpoint Mechanical Pencil}} ([{{fullurl:Clearpoint Mechanical Pencil|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearpoint Mechanical Pencil}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

It is a mechanical pencil, and it lacks notability. Should be deleted per WP:PRODUCT. ZimZalaBim talk 18:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Merge/redirect to Papermate#Types of pencils/pens a brief summary per WP:PRODUCT. The list of product names would benefit from a short description of the products. Smile a While (talk) 20:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge I would boldly merge and redirect. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment Once it's merged and redirected, this will become a moot point, and good riddance. The article dates from 2005, when even an IP address could create a page. I can think of few things more boring than a detailed description of a Paper Mate pencil, other than a blog review of a pencil. To his credit, the author did try to make this creative instrument sound sorta erotic, what with the fat design, the side lead advancer and the rubbery grip, if ya know what I mean. Mandsford (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Props to Mandsford, for making AfD less of a chore to look over. and Merge. ThuranX (talk) 23:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.