Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford Maracle
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 14:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Clifford Maracle]]=
:{{la|Clifford Maracle}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Clifford Maracle}})
I respectfully suggest this artist seems non-notable. The most frequently cited source is an unverifiable master's thesis, and other sources are mainly indirectly related (primarily re: Native American art in general and not the subject). A Google search reveals most mentions are related to past small gallery shows and others don't seem related to his art at all. The article appears to be almost entirely original research. B.Rossow · talk 01:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B.Rossow · talk 01:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. B.Rossow · talk 01:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep based on the fact that his works are found in the collections of the Canadian Museum of History, the McMichael Canadian Art Collection, and the Thunder Bay Art Gallery, all notable by Wikipedia standards. Satisfies #4 of WP:NARTIST. Curiocurio (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep the nomination is a non-starter as he is in multiple museum collections, as {{u|Curiocurio}} points out. I have added two sources for verification, which verifies three of the five collections listed in the article.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.