Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Carney

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

=[[Clint Carney]]=

:{{la|Clint Carney}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clint_Carney Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Clint Carney}})

Fails WP:GNG, non-notable musician JMHamo (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete as searches found no significant and notable coverage as shown [http://doom-magazine.net/rancase/2011/11/13/horror-in-oil-the-art-of-clint-carney here] (one link from News, DOOM Magazine), [https://books.google.com/books?id=ycd7AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA158&dq=Clint+Carney+artist+Los+Angeles&hl=en&sa=X&ei=aOpvVf2FJMausAWzqoL4BQ&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Clint%20Carney%20artist%20Los%20Angeles&f=false here] (from Books, extremely minor mention), nothing at Highbeam and thefreelibrary and finally [https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Clint+Carney&gws_rd=ssl#q=Clint+Carney+artist+Los+Angeles&hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0 here] (browser, various links such as LA Weekly) but nothing outstandingly significant and notable and, frankly, it doesn't take much to see this not to mention he is obscure and eccentric and that's not something that gets much attention sometimes. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Only source in the article is the subjects own website. Nothing else can be found to establish notability. Article is pure self-promotion. Kraxler (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.