Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clodhopper (shoe)

=[[Clodhopper (shoe)]]=

:{{la|Clodhopper (shoe)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Clodhopper (shoe)}})

totally unreferenced steaming pile of original research. WuhWuzDat 00:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete This is a slang word that has been used for decades, but reliable sources just use the word in passing. I haven't been able to find any that discuss the topic in depth. Not notable for Wikipedia, but perhaps appropriate for Wictionary. Cullen328 (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep. Such a common term there will be refs out there. I won't be looking for them though. Szzuk (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

:*Comment..So, we are just supposed to take your word for it?. WuhWuzDat 23:41, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

:: That's what I do, you can make your own mind up! FWIW I looked for refs and couldn't find anything but I'm staying with keep regardless :) Szzuk (talk) 15:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:::When I find a reliable source that says Szzuk is a reliable source, I'll take your word for it, until then I will stick to what can be referenced. WuhWuzDat 19:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:::: A webpage that says Szzuk is a reliable source. Give me 5 minutes ;-) Szzuk (talk) 21:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.