Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClusterKnoppix
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 16:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
=[[ClusterKnoppix]]=
:{{la|ClusterKnoppix}} – (
:({{Find sources|ClusterKnoppix}})
Failing GNG Mr. Guye (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete—I've actually used this distro and was surprised that I couldn't find any reviews. Unfortunately, this doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The Google book search actually reveals a bit of in depth discussion of the topic at hand. Whether it's really enough for notability, I'm not certain. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Notability established by significant coverage in [http://books.google.com/books?id=YaSWlOOxshsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=ClusterKnoppix&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5v8eVPWOMIWlyASaqIDAAw&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=ClusterKnoppix&f=false] and [http://books.google.com/books?id=Xw8zLz3H8WAC&pg=PT45&dq=ClusterKnoppix&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5v8eVPWOMIWlyASaqIDAAw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=ClusterKnoppix&f=false]. ~KvnG 16:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
::*{{rto|KvnG}}: Nice catch on the first, but the second looks like the topic is mentioned in a single sentence. Am I reading that correctly? Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
:::I think you are. [http://books.google.com/books?id=Mm-BM5K5p90C&pg=PA1171&dq=clusterKnoppix&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0TAgVP3yO4aZyATy5YCgAw&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=clusterKnoppix&f=false Here's] another book with a bit more coverage. [http://clusterfudge.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/building-your-own-load-balancing-beowulf-cluster-from-economy-pcs/ Here's] a review. It's a blog so not clearly reliable. ~KvnG 14:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.