Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde vanbarrel

=[[Clyde vanbarrel]]=

:{{la|Clyde vanbarrel}} ([{{fullurl:Clyde vanbarrel|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde vanbarrel}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Biography presenting no evidence of notability. Fails WP:BIO. Speedy deletion declined twice, so bringing it here. Astronaut (talk) 22:48, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Pure vanispamcruftisement created by an editor ({{User|Arkonian}}) with self-proclaimed WP:COI issues, i.e., "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests&diff=prev&oldid=301572990 I was assigned to create an article for my employers , clyde vanbarrel and kyle vanbarrel]" … their talkpage documents their recreation of these NN articles. Happy Editing! — {{#if:138.88.7.48|{{User|138.88.7.48}}|138.88.7.48 (talk)}} 05:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, no proof of notability, no references supplied, no notability can be found, creator admitted at WP:EAR that she/he is an employee who had been asked to create article , i.e. paid editor. Jezhotwells (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Speedy Delete as spam. Edward321 (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete this, no reason to have declined the speedy in the first place. DreamGuy (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.