Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoFluent Design

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

=[[:CoFluent Design]]=

:{{la|1=CoFluent Design}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=CoFluent Design}})

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NPRODUCT or WP:GNG, and there is no obvious WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can resolve it now. Boleyn (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and France. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

:EE Times says it was reported by Intel in 2011, so it should be mention somewhere on the Intel articles. (Also mentioned on List of EDA companies) IgelRM (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

:Delete - The best source the article has is [https://www.eetimes.com/french-eda-startup-is-fluent-in-co-design-3/ eeTimes], but even if that meets GNG we need more than one. Google news, web, and web archive are barren. Same goes for the Wikipedia Library. We don't have enough sources to establish notability. —Sirdog (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete a mere 2 gnews hits. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.