Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cococinel

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

=[[Cococinel]]=

:{{la|Cococinel}} ([{{fullurl:Cococinel|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cococinel}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable. No reliable sources, only an IMDB entry. YeaH, Ino (talk) 12:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

:Keep, could use some more references but appears to be notable. --fvw * 12:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Keep as per Fvw. Edward321 (talk) 14:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep A second source has been added; it could use more, but appears to be notable. --Fullobeans (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment - right, well if it is notable, then how come it doesn't have an entry in the [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cococinel French Wikipedia]? After all, these kinds of things tend to have articles in their own languages relevant to the article's topic first, right? Also, I don't see that anything here meets WP:RS. IMDB is just a user-generated content website and may not be reliable, and the second source I don't know about either.-YeaH, Ino (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

::French Wikipedia=738,189 articles. English Wikipedia=2,659,859 articles. Presumably this will be among the next million or two articles written in French.--Fullobeans (talk) 06:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep, seems marginally notable.-Juvvaglott (talk) 19:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Also a note - the nominator has been indef blocked. — neuro^(talk) 20:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.