Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffeeforless

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[Coffeeforless]]=

:{{la|Coffeeforless}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Coffeeforless Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Coffeeforless}})

Nothing here that shows any notability. Several press releases. Mentions in directory listing and records of undoubtedly well meant philanthropic endeavours but nothing that adds up to notability. Self promotion yes, notability no. Fails WP:CORP  Velella  Velella Talk   23:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  23:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete for now unfortunately as there's simply nothing for better improvement as there's not enough coverage. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. I would probably have nominated it for speedy deletion, It shows no indication of notability oreen importance. DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Something tells me if this is written in a neutral way it could perhaps become notable but as it stands promotional bollocks like "Realizing the importance of our youth's education CoffeeForLess hopes to help our future business leaders meet their educational goals" makes me want to kill it with fire!, Anyway I can't find bugger all notability-wise so fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 00:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.