Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinrule

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Coinrule}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinrule}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Coinrule}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 06:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Coinrule]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Coinrule}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Coinrule}})

Run-of-the-mill crypto company, no noteworthy third party coverage to speak of unfortunately. Had meant to nominate this two weeks ago but it slipped my mind. In any case, here it is now. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Companies, and United Kingdom. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete: Forbes is a contributor piece, The Standard isn't a RS. Neither of these help. I can only bring up PR items, I don't see notability for this crypto firm. Oaktree b (talk) 20:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment the Standard is an electronic outlet published by Evening Standard which is "no consensus" at WP:RSP. The [https://www.standard.co.uk/business/coinrule-bitcoin-bots-hassle-free-crypto-trading-b978419.html linked article] doesn't show a lot of editorial independence, but I'm unaware of any consensus around the outlet itself. Oblivy (talk) 04:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
  • :Sorry, it's orange, as is the Forbes piece, both of questionable notability per Cite Highlighter, that wasn't clear in my first comment. Oaktree b (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
  • ::I don't know what you mean by "it's orange". Perennial sources shows it as yellow; isn't that the most reliable place to look? Oblivy (talk) 23:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
  • :::Yellow and orange mean pretty much the same thing (MREL) and all of the usual userscripts take things from the same places, but while I would not be impressed at someone using a MREL source to try and establish NCORP in most cases, the easier reason to reject this one is because it's 90% quotes. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.