Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colegiul Pacientilor

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 06:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[Colegiul Pacientilor]]=

:{{la|Colegiul Pacientilor}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Colegiul_Pacientilor Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Colegiul Pacientilor}})

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. No evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 14:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete as searches found nothing better and it's not surprising considering this started this year. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
delete no article in Romanian. Unlikely to be extensive coverage for brand new organisation. LibStar (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.