Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color rendering capacity

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

=[[Color rendering capacity]]=

:{{la|Color rendering capacity}} – (View AfD)(View log)

The concept "color render capacity" seems to be idiosyncratic to its originator; there are no book or scholar hits to suggest it has achieved any kind of notability. —Dicklyon (talk) 06:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Looks like a bit of OR or something like that. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 16:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment: Plainly not “original research”, as there are some published references. But doesn't seem to be much of a blip on the radar. —SlamDiego_←T 16:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete. This appears to be a standard concept (the gamut, or some measure of the size of the gamut) but described incoherently in nonstandard terminology. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.